Untold
thousands, if not millions, of illegal immigrants work in the underground
economy without any civil rights. Next
time you buy that cheap shirt or blouse made in China remember that the item
itself as well as the Made in China label could have come from Southern
California. Louis Vuitton spent millions
combing the slums of Manila, Calcutta and similar cities searching for those
counterfeiting their products. But an investigator from Santa Ana found the
illicit factory in Southern California. Meanwhile, the government bureaucrats in
their lofty perches scratched their heads wondering why the LA sewage treatment
plant kept overflowing. It was commonplace for a dozen or so people to live squeezed
into a one bedroom apartment. Anyone who
supports open borders supports a gangster style slave labor system.
But
this discussion of legal or illegal has been too often defined as being pro or
anti immigrant. Manipulation of the defining terms is, however, more clever
than the blanket rejection of information all too often evident in local
Facebook discussions. I wonder about these people who don’t try to examine both
sides of an argument because thoughtful people read both sides and seek understanding. Politics is the art of the possible. Any mature person knows that that are good
and bad sites across the political spectrum.
I consider Liberals Unite to be a hate site while Counterpunch offers
factual, reasoned analysis although I usually question their assumptions and
discard their conclusions. One left wing
feminist article I read had observant insights contrasting women’s roles in the
Tea Parties with the Republican Party. Reading differing points of view makes
one think, the apparent unthinkable to many local commentators. Instead these
Facebook commentators instantly and unequivocally reject many sites or sources
as fake news. This obviously reflects their negligible commitment to democratic
process. Their only real interest is in pushing their restrictive agenda.
Their
persuasion substitute (as noted above with terminology control) lies in their techniques.
Another example often used to confuse is to frame the debate as Democrat versus
Republican. But the conflict of our time is globalism, which includes far too
many Republicans, versus we the people populism. One doesn’t have to look
further than the wild & scenic designation for part of Mokelumne River or our
General Plan for evidence of our predetermined slot in globalist nightmare. It
is our future and it must be in our hands.
Copyright
2018, Mark L. Bennett
No comments:
Post a Comment