There
is now a daily crisis of Muslim terror for the ordinary people of Europe. This is also occurring more frequently here
in the USA although the mainstream media seem to just report the headline
massacres. Obama is importing as many
Somali Muslims as he can get away with before he leaves office. An historic
dilemma may face us and also determine the quality of our future.
Today
we publicly focus on slavery and Native American decimation. But we have
forgotten, as probably a statement of healing, our history of religious
intolerance. The New England Puritans hung Quakers. Everyone had to pay a tax
to the Church of England whether they were Anglican or not until the Revolution.
The history of anti-Catholicism is long and sad and lingered until the Kennedy
presidency. Anti-Semitism only faded when the horrors of the Holocaust became
known.
Since
the 1960’s expansion of immigration, significant Hindu, Buddhist and Sikh
communities have been established here. That has generally gone smoothly. But
while there have been unfortunate incidents, they have been the work of hateful
crazies. They will always exist on the fringe, that is the nature of human
society. And while their crimes are inexcusable, they cannot render our
values. But having to label and separate
one religion as dangerous presents an historic dilemma. As our streets,
campuses, night clubs, offices, military bases, etc suffer Muslim brutality
this discussion will begin. Plus there is the reality of vigilante activity and
that danger to innocent Muslims.
Liberals
preach tolerance. I can hardly disagree with tolerance and my personal beliefs
are simple. There is one God or Great Spirit or Universal Wholeness or whatever
term you want to use. There are many paths to that connection because there are
many different people. Use the one that works for you. Muslims enjoy calling
the Mass ritual cannibalism. While I can understand their definition, the Mass
positively connects over a billion people to the divine. By what absolute arrogance could anyone
consider that wrong?
I
have studied the Arabian tribes back to at least 3200 BC including their exemplary
economy based on raiding caravans, plundering cities and slave trading. They
had the revelation of Islam in the 600’s and used the Catholic Church as a
model to integrate conquered counties into a unified empire. I’ve read as much
of the Koran as I could stomach. All this information is available to anyone
including their numerous frauds such as taking the zero from India and selling
it to Europe as their own. I have
personally and intellectually concluded, as have many others, that Islam is a
political ideology masquerading as a religion. They call it immigration jihad
while the globalist establishment calls it refugee resettlement.
Some
hope that Islam can reform itself as have the other faiths that modernized. I
know two clergy working with Imams. But
this wishful thinking may not be reality. While I don’t know what will happen
in Europe as the situation worsens, we all know that they have a history of
separating people by faith. We not do have such a history, but we are
approaching the point where we may. That may become a necessary decision in the
near future and a difficult, precedent setting dilemma.
Copyright
2016, Mark L. Bennett