The Presidential election is heating up, and some are maligning Donald Trump as a
racist. At the same time, those on the far left are leveling charges of racism
that seem rather far out to most people. It seems appropriate to now critically
examine who is racist.
New
York’s far left mayor, Bill de Blasio, charged that Congress hasn’t bailed out
Puerto Rico because Puerto Ricans are people of color. There is, of course, no
proof of this. My 11/9/15 post, Free Puerto Rico!, documents how Puerto Rico
which could have been the Hong Kong or Singapore of the Caribbean got into its
current mess. It was chosen by the Roosevelt’s New Deal as a socialist
experiment. Was it chosen because Puerto Ricans are “people of color” and the
New Dealers figured they could get away with this experiment there, rather than
the white mainland? If that were the case, then the white liberals were the
racists, not the current, anti-bail out Republicans, who want the Puerto Rican
dependency to stand on its own two feet, just like any parent would teach their
children.
Recently
“Mickey Fearn, the National Park Service Deputy Director for Communications and
Community Assistance, made headlines when he claimed that black people don’t
visit national parks because they associate
them with slaves being
lynched by their masters…Carolyn Finney…a diversity advisor to the U.S.
National Parks Advisory Board. .. claims that oppression and violence against
black people in forests and other green spaces can translate into contemporary
understandings that constrain African-American environmental understandings’…the
tree is a racist symbol to black people.” While this seems like a nonsensical
extreme position to most people, Ms. Finney goes on to say: “Theodore
Roosevelt’s vision of preserving beautiful natural landscapes was rooted in ‘privilege’.
This contains some truth, as I have previously implied that the conservation
movement started as an elitist movement of upper class white Anglo-Saxon
Protestants against the then new immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe
(i.e., Catholics and Jews). It also attacked poor whites, as I documented in a
post a few years ago about Roosevelt’s Civil Conservation Corp goons burning
down the homes of people in the Shenandoah Mountains, who stood in the way of a
park for Washington’s liberal environmental elite. So while what Ms. Finney
said was not untrue, it was not white versus black, but clearly we the people
against upper class environmental liberalism.
For
more years than I can remember, I have read white liberal writers extol the
success of a black person making the assumption that they rose from poverty.
This is a racist assumption. While relatively small on a percent basis, large
numbers of black people come from well-to-do families that sometimes go back to
Reconstruction. Many white farmers divided their land among their former
slaves. Miles Davis was the son of a dentist whose family were also large
landowners. Chuck Berry grew up in a comfortable, suburban single family home.
And, of course, we have affirmative action that insults black people by saying
that they aren’t capable of competing on their own merits. So again, we have
the liberals apparently both expressing and repressing their own racism by
calling everyone else a racist when, in fact, they are the racists.
Currently, we have many in politics, and especially in the Hillary Clinton campaign,
dividing and subdividing the American people into demographic slices to
manipulate them into voting a certain way, often by exploiting racial
differences. But reality shows - and Donald Trump knows - that an unemployed
black steel worker is more likely to vote the same way as an unemployed white
steel worker, rather than on the basis of some hyped-up media driven, racial
divide. While this strategy may help liberal Democrats win elections, it is not
good for our nation as a whole, as it breeds racism instead of diminishing those
sick attitudes.
When
the Rodney King riots broke out in Los Angeles, the state legislator, and now
Congresswomen Maxine Waters, grabbed the microphone and repeated tired talking
points about racism. What she refused to acknowledge was that her headquarters - along with businesses-owned by wealthy blacks - were also burned down. The Rodney
King riots were also class riots. I have seen that which holds black people
down is the same as that which holds white people down: too much regulation.
Often, the first thing one notices in black neighborhoods is the amount of
entrepreneurial activity. Unfortunately, much of it is illegal: selling stolen
merchandise, drugs, pimping, etc. But street kids often make good
business people, and this can be channeled productively. When I suggested this in
a local online discussion a few years ago, I was put down by a left winger for
not being an “expert”.
A case
study tells the story of a black man on the south side of Chicago who dropped
out of high school at the age of 16, and started painting houses. He discovered a talent
for this, and after a few years, had thousands of happy customers and about 100
employees. But he conducted his business in cash from his pockets, not being
the type to have a MBA in finance. Fortunately, conservative economists - affiliated
with Milton Friedman - found him, and properly reorganized his enterprise.
Otherwise, the liberal Democrats running Chicago would have treated him as a
criminal to fine, or worse. If someone is skilled, hard working, honest and
providing a needed, legitimate service or product...by what right does society
have to expect much more of them? I have
witnessed black and other so-called minority people driven out of business in
Central Los Angeles through down-zoning. This was brought about by left-wing
Leninists wanting to create a housing shortage to bring about government
control of housing (heightening the contradictions in their terms). They didn’t
care about black people, or anyone else; just achieving their perverted, Utopian totalitarian dream.
Many
leaders in the black community have urged getting off the liberal Democrat
plantation of fatherless homes, welfare dependency and victimization. When you have decided in advance to fail, it
becomes hard to succeed. It wasn’t always that way. In my former business life, my lead carpenter was a black man who had grown up in dire poverty in rural
Indiana. His healthcare was a folk healer/herb doctor who lived hidden away in
the woods. Because his folks couldn’t afford to feed him at 14 years of age, he
was given to a white family. That enabled him to finish high school followed by
several army years in Europe during and after World War Two. He believed in the
American Dream, and that, if you did the right thing, you would get ahead. So he
began employment at McDonnell Douglas in Los Angeles, bought a suburban home
(although the area was still pretty segregated back then), regularly attended and was active in his church, maintained a stable marriage and raised two
wonderful children. While his youngest son was attending UC Santa Cruz, the
older sister married into one of the wealthiest black families in America, and
was interviewed on 60 Minutes. When he spoke about that, his face lit up like a
portrait of a Medieval saint. It was a long way from that “witch woman” in the
woods.
His
retirement was now looming ahead. He understood that his years of freelance
work had created a sound business with established clients, an intimate
knowledge of sourcing materials in the complex LA market and his own skill.
Since his own children did not need or want the business, he decided to give it
to a deserving young black man. One day, he arrived at my door with such a
person, introduced us and asked if I would hire him in the future. I said, "Absolutely." We all shook hands. About a year later I asked what had happened.
He said that the man worked a few weeks, spent his pay on drugs, disappeared
into the streets, and that two more similar prospects had done the same. He
wanted to give away his business, but all the candidates had decided that
victimhood beat responsibility. His face was despairing and vacant at the same
time. I have seen that look only once before, and that was on holocaust
survivors.
Copyright
2016, Mark L. Bennett
No comments:
Post a Comment