One
advantage of aging is a longer perspective.
Food companies have been under pressure for decades to reduce the
preservatives in their products. One doesn’t have to take a logic class to
figure out that anything that prevents food from decaying would also make it
hard to decay (digest) in your gut. Those on the left charge that corporate
greed demands a long shelf life. The food producers have argued that consumers asked
for longer shelf lives. The purer food people denounced that as pure bunk. But
one of those requesting consumers was my mother. She was a liberal sticking it
to big corporations to sell what she considered a better, longer lasting product.
Some
years ago, Greece was too much of a fiscal mess to join the EU so they hired
Goldman Sachs to cook their books for a multi million fee. After they did that they
then shorted Greek debt and made another bundle. Today Greece is collapsing. I'm
sure Hillary Clinton must feel horridly guilty every time she takes another
donation check from Goldman Sachs.
But no matter what happens its always
business as usual in Washington. The Department of Agriculture recently
received $17 million to inspect catfish despite the Food and Drug
Administration already spending $7 million inspecting catfish. Please remember
that although outside lobbyists play a major role in closed door Washington, the
right of government agencies to lobby for themselves was part of FDR’s new deal
for America. Now the two agencies have agreed to work jointly and to, over time,
separate their respective seafood turfs. So there’s no need to worry that
anyone will lose their cushy job or pension on our dime. It’s easy to
understand that those in power want to maintain regulatory pressure on the
population of catfish raising rural southern areas similar to what Obama did
when reducing the number of auto dealerships during the car companies’ brief
nationalization. “Coincidently” many big Republican donors lost their
dealerships then. But catfish and similar type fish enter the USA from
Southeast Asia with hardly any inspection. If this gives you shivers about the
Trans-Pacific Partnership you are probably not alone.
Much of this product has been
banned in Russia because it contains E. coli and listeria. But why worry?
Certainly California will require a vaccination against those germs soon. And
if you can’t wait, you can always become someone you are not. Two billion
dollars of the world’s economy are Botox sales. But if the morality of extreme
vanity bothers you, again why worry? The government is always there to lend a
helping hand. When first quarter gross domestic product figures came in lower
than expected the San Francisco Fed suggested changing the seasonal adjustment
factors to create a higher number so we could all feel better.
D. Norman recently posted a
discussion about entitlements here where in he calls for “complete and factual
information.” Then this must include things he didn’t mention such as illegal
immigrants who may have never worked a day in this county receiving benefits
and the huge benefit provider industry. This includes J.P. Morgan EFS,
Affiliated Computer Services, and eFunds. Since 2004 JPMorgan has been paid
almost $6 million. The more they enroll the more they make. So there’s an
incentive to get people on the dole. As
with too many government programs it’s not the cost of the benefit but the cost
of and style of administration. Nobody in America wants to eat diseased fish or
let the poor to starve.
Copyright
2015, Mark L. Bennett
You are certainly correct that Goldman Sachs played a key role in Greece’s entry into the EU. But your account fails to provide the proper context.
ReplyDeleteDavid Harris Gerson wrote about the issue back in 2012:
“How could such a deal be allowed?
Simple: just as in the United States, where our government's financial institutions failed to protect (and even helped precipitate) the subprime fiasco, financial institutions in Europe helped to create an environment in which countries would look to investment banks such as Goldman Sachs to hide, or swap, their debts.
And investment banks, like Goldman Sachs, were all too eager to take advantage of countries, such as Greece, by using fictitious instruments that were being ignored and certainly allowed (if not promoted) by the E.U.
Which is why… E.U. officials' anger with Greece is nothing but pure hypocrisy.
But hypocrisy is a concept. An idea. An ethereal truth.
What's real? Austerity. The reduction of social service jobs. The cutting of minimum wage. The struggling of families in Greece to put food on the table.”
I’m no fan of Goldman Sachs either, but they jumped in when an opportunity was presented to them. It wasn’t like it was their idea alone, and they muscled in and took advantage of a weak country.
Also, I wasn’t surprised when your only response to my 1,700-word commentary on entitlements was to something that was contained in the last sentence. Did you even bother to read it, or is your mind already made up when you note the author of the piece? You take issue with a company providing a service costing $6 million over 10 years, but don’t acknowledge the billions in cost savings that I point out in my commentary. I completely disagree with your statement: “So there’s an incentive to get people on the dole.” Perhaps I would if JP Morgan were making billions of dollars on their benefit provider services.
D. Norman
D. Norman –You certainly have an affinity for accusation. How do you know if I read your entire piece or not? Obviously you would prefer to slur me by the conjecturing that I would respond without reading it in its entirety. If you did some research you would find that there is an inventive to get people on the dole. As for cost savings, I suggest employment opportunities would be a bigger cost savings than an expended welfare state, but that would make less people dependent upon the government and certainly be unprogressive. Regarding Greece and Goldman Sachs you said that I failed to provide a “proper context”. I find that to be a very strange statement from someone who often claims a monopoly on facts and considers the rest to be opinion. It took me awhile to find out who David Harris Gerson was. I found one self indulgent article in the Huffington Post and the rest was about Islamphobia. Perhaps he would have called Winston Churchill a Naziphobe during the Battle of Britain?
ReplyDelete