Environmental Extremism Metastasizes

A Greek mining project worth about a billion dollars in exports to Greece, equaling 2% of their total exports, is being delayed. Joining forces with the environmentalists is the Greek Communist Party.

“Blood will flow if this continues,” stated one opponent.  In addition to Greece mining projects have been stopped or inhibited by environmentalists in Portugal, Spain and Cyprus. Does all this have a relationship to their economic plights or is it just some inexplicable coincidence?

The Bristol Bay/Pebble Bay project in Alaska could create 15,000 American jobs and contribute over $2.4 billion to GDP annually. To prevent this the EPA has adopted a new and unprecedented approach. They rejected the project based on their own biased, in house model before the project developers could even submit their proposal which contained newer and more detailed information costing them over $150 million dollars. The environmental opposition’s rhetoric bears an uncanny resemblance to the local Newman Ridge opponents. The potential of the local Sutter Gold property, only 4.6 % of Amador County’s share of the Mother Lode, is about $1.5 billion at current gold prices. And that’s with 90% of their small property unexplored.

We are lucky to have mining potential here since the timber industry has been destroyed.  Other timber counties are not so lucky. Josephine County in Oregon is now considering having just one Sheriff’s patrol for its 83,000 residents. Curry County, also in Oregon, is facing a state takeover. Liberal Democrat Governor John Kitzhaber, who sat in Michelle Obama’s box at the 2013 State of the Union address, proposed an increase in property taxes for these two distressed counties. After the voters rejected that he proposed a local income tax and threatened the residents with National Guard troops or state police to replace the depleted locally controlled law enforcement.  The logic of fighting poverty by increasing poverty escapes me.

Is there any lesson here for Amador County?  While we are well governed fiscally, and are near major cities that send us tourists unlike the Oregon counties discussed, the situation grows worse each year.

Yet an elitist well financed and manipulative minority has undue influence here and throughout the foothills. They call themselves environmentalists; I call them the pro poverty lobby. How long are we going to put up with this?

Copyright 2013, Mark L. Bennett

Outside the Ivory Tower: Environmental Extremism & God Continue

The Federal Government is planning to spend about a million dollars a year to kill around 9,000 striped owls because they are winning the competition with the deified spotted owl.  Among the striped owls crimes are interbreeding with the spotted owls. And I had naively thought that the crime of miscegenation disappeared with the rest of the racist Jim Crow laws.

We were overrun with English sparrows when I was growing up in Western New York.  Everyone said that they came with the original English settlers, had no known predators and were here to stay.  But on a return visit a friend pointed out that the sparrows were gone and had been replaced by wrens and finches. Nature moves in cycles. The Ancients knew this, from the prophets in the Bible to the misunderstood Mayans.

From the cells of our bodies to the galaxies of interstellar space, everything is in motion. Creation is ongoing. To paraphrase an old Bob Dylan song: those not busy being born are busy dying. There is no stasis.  But science, by its very nature, requires a freeze in time and space.  This is essential for observation, but serves poorly as a state religion. The change from the ecology movement to environmentalism was more than a change in terminology. An awareness of dynamism became policies, inherently doomed to fail, of attempts at forced stagnation.

Copyright 2013, Mark L. Bennett

Outside the Ivory Tower: Memorial Day

At this time of year, in what used to be a far more solemn occasion, we honor our war dead. The other name for this day, Decoration Day, has fallen out of favor as few today decorate their graves or pray at the cemeteries for those who have kept us free.  Someone who had once visited the Normandy Beach cemetery told me that no words could express her emotions as the graves disappeared over the horizon.  

Memorial Day started spontaneously during and after the Civil War.  While Waterloo, NY got the official nod as the first, many communities could claim that honor. One was Charlestown, South Carolina, then called the “city of the dead”. The Washington Race Course had been converted to a POW camp where about 257 dead Union soldiers were thrown together into a series of shallow graves. When the war ended about 10,000 grateful former slaves marched to the site. Some of them remained and after two weeks of gruesome work they had exhumed the bodies. They gave every veteran a proper burial, calling them the Martyrs of the Race Course. They called themselves Friends of the Martyrs and the Patriotic Association of Colored Men. Almost 3,000 children, the first generation of freedom, marched to the finished cemetery singing John Brown’s Body and the Star Spangled Banner. They threw enough flowers to create hill of rose petals. Joined by other participants including missionaries and union soldiers, black and white, they sang a hymn and prayed.

This is a sharp contrast to mob violence rallying cry of “get whitey”, critical race theory and the race baiting of Al Sharpton and many others. When we honor those who died we should not forget why they died. Politically profitable race hatred is not among the reasons.

Copyright 2013, Mark L. Bennett

Outside the Ivory Tower: Yellow Legged Frogs Rule!

On May 15, 2013 the Board of Supervisors discussed sending a letter of opposition to the US Fish and Wildlife Service regarding their proposal to remove about 1.8 million acres from constructive use as designated habitat for the allegedly endangered or threatened yellow legged frog.  The Supervisors wisely decided to reopen this discussion at a later date as a public hearing with the intended presence of the Fish and Wildlife Service.  I made the following comments to the Supervisors which incorporate some statements I’ve made earlier:

 “Thank you for letting me speak. About a year ago I went to the Forest Service website to see what they were doing in our area and read about ten projects in the El Dorado National Forest.  One was  The Indian Valley Restoration Project which involved ‘three quarters of a mile of a tributary stream of Indian Creek using a series of plug and ponds to enhance habitat  for yellow- legged frogs, Yosemite toad, willow fly catcher’ and others.  Note the word enhance. Many within the Forest Service and in the proposal’s public comments stated that the project was unnecessary. Sometime later I went back to the Forest Service website and could not find those comments. Perhaps the project comments were taken off their website or perhaps it’s a lack in my computer skills. However, those proposal comments are public record and I would assume available to the County.

I also learned that plug means bringing in boulders from the Silver Lake area. Since many within the Forest Service want to ban vehicles by closing roads, I wondered what equipment was used. At a recent Forest Service public meeting I asked one of the forest rangers. I was told yes; they were using diesel trailer trucks or similar equipment.

While the Forest Service site gave details about the projects, their cost was conspicuously absent. So I emailed the Forest Service. Their prompt and courteous reply said that the Indian Valley Restoration Project “is estimated at about $200,000.” I would like to make the simple statement  that this environmental extravagance is a waste of taxpayer dollars, but I cannot say that since this money is borrowed from the Chinese and others, or just printed by the Federal Reserve which will curse us, at some  future time, with inflation and hurt lower income people the most.

Also over the past year I have been a member of the Amador County Transportation Commission’s Pine Grove Stakeholders Group. During this time two critical yellow legged frog habitats suddenly appeared in Pine Grove.  I don’t believe that the yellow legged frog and these other animals are endangered or even threatened. I don’t confuse an excuse with a reason. I do believe that these species are a subsidized, political constituency that are part of the larger picture of kicking people and economic activity out of rural areas. The discussions in this chamber regarding homeowners’ insurance, grey wolves, mountain lions, town centers in the General Plan and countless other topics are part of that same larger picture. I ask that you move forward with this letter of opposition to the designation of about 1.8 million acres as critical habitat.”

After I spoke someone told me that the project had changed and that Coca Cola is now financing it. This led me to: http://www.fs.usda.gov/detailfull/r5/workingtogether/?cid=stelprdb5390138&width=full

Along with Coke another corporation is sponsoring this project as part of a partnership of about 11 organizations. Included is the Foothill Conservancy which is monitoring the project. Not surprisingly, it doesn’t say if they are getting paid. The project has now grown in scope to approximately 35 plug and ponds.  This involves three days for road construction, about one week for materials delivery and about three to four weeks for plug and pond construction.   Yet this new construction is called a restoration and is being sold to the public as such.  The project promoters are obliviously lying. Their only evidence is the Washoe Tribe claim that this is consistent with prehistoric conditions.

At a recent Upcounty Community Council meeting I heard that Gallagher’s Pub and adjoining facilities in Pioneer will soon be closing and that the greenhouse operation at the former cedar mill site is having financial trouble. Also discussed was Family Dollar Stores pressuring Payless Market in Pioneer to close. This is all a stark contrast to the resources devoted to plugs and ponds for the yellow legged frog. Some people’s priorities seem distorted. Perhaps I need a social psychologist to understand them.  But unless something changes we should all learn to love the yellow legged frog since our developing economy may depend on them.

Yellow legged frogs do, at least in coastal and nearby areas, have a real problem. A fatal parasite came here attached to the imported African clawed frogs. (Giant African land snails, which can transmit meningitis to humans, have also entered parts of the USA. Isn’t globalization wonderful? We send our jobs overseas and get back new diseases in return.)  But if yellow legged frogs are in danger, the approach of the environmental movement of propagating more of them has the consequence of spreading more of this parasite.  It’s as if medieval people decided to fight the black plague by having more children.  Instead, those who survived did so by cleaning the streets of rats and garbage and washing their bed linen more often. Common sense says to fight the disease as was done at the UC Davis campus. But this is not about the environment; it’s about social and economic control. As I stated to the Board of Supervisors: “I don’t confuse an excuse with a reason… these species are a subsidized political constituency that are part of the larger picture of kicking people and economic activity out of rural areas.”

Rather than being loved, the frogs are being used.  Personally, I am rather fond of frogs and have had some “pet” frogs on my property. And if I am ever able to complete my landscaping projects, I will have a frog habitat in my garden.

___

Copyright 2013, Mark L. Bennett except for the section spoken to the Board of Supervisors, which is now public record.

Outside the Ivory Tower: Global Warming, Environmental Extremism & God

Many environmental extremists are hysterical about global warming to the point of calling insane those opposed to their dogma. They blame industrialization’s greenhouse gases for an allegedly warmer earth.

Their reasoning appears to be some sort of collective secular guilt for which they propose mass suffering by destroying our present way of life. But in reality the very environmental extremism policies they have implemented are a significantly larger contributor to greenhouse gases than industrialization.

Desertification, the process by which grasslands become deserts, reduces potential food supply and increases greenhouse gases more than industrialization. Grasslands, in the US, were normally full of buffalos and other herd animals. When they traveled through, even if there was little too eat, they fertilized as they walked and more importantly they trammeled the ground. Without the soil breaking under their hoofs the soil cannot retain moisture from the rainy season and bakes hard in the summer.

The next rainy season the water runs off the hardened soil and a desert begins. Prior to environmental extremism the wild animals were replaced with sheep and cattle herds grazing our Western “public lands”. The land was healthy, as Range Magazine has repeatedly shown, but environmental “science” said that the sheep and cattle were destroying the land.

Biologist Allan Savory was responsible for killing 40,000 African elephants to save the land before he realized that he was actually creating the deserts he was trying to prevent. Science often makes the presumption that they know better than what has been natural for countless millennia. To my mind this is humans thinking they are God. In this very scientific National Geographic video, Allan Savory makes a public confession. I found it straight forward and haunting.

I urge everyone to watch: http://

newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2013/03/06/how-cows-could-repair-the-world-allan-savory-at-ted/

Copyright 2013, Mark L. Bennett

Outside the Ivory Tower: 42 Roads Continued

Outside the Ivory Tower: 42 Roads Continued

At the end of October “42 Roads and the New Forest” was posted. It asked people to attend a Forest Service open house. Their plans have moved along and on 3/6/2013 another open house was held. I submitted the following:

Comments on the El Dorado National Forest Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for Travel Management Project dated February, 2013

Firstly, I wish to thank all those responsible for this detailed analysis of the National Forests’ roads. And I want to especially thank those responsible for the very productive efforts that produced alternatives exhibiting common sense enforcement of the existing environmental laws. Some of these alternatives significantly modify a court order of extreme environmental ideology. However, I am not satisfied with any of them. No routes, except for rare exceptions, should have been closed. Given our population growth and the growing need of outdoor experience for urban people, the Forest Service should be expanding, not reducing, use of the National Forests. “Cross country travel” roads, which are now prohibited, are essential for emergency services and for logging. They also allow people to enjoy the forest while going to other destinations.

Forest roads should not be reserved only for those with the time to explore dead end roads. But dead end roads should also not be closed because they provide access to more private locations. People have the right to experience a forest, not a more crowded park like situation. None of what I’ve said, however, is meant to preclude improvements or changes in a probably small number of very destructive road situations. I would prefer the Forest Service to devote itself to fixing those very few situations and expanding, not restricting, forest use.

Mark L. Bennett, Pine Grove

Outside the Ivory Tower: F-16’s to Egypt

With news stories such as “innocent civilians crushed and shot to death, and their only crime was participating in a peaceful march to reject the destruction of their church” many Americans have understandably objected to our recent gift of F-16’s and other state of the art weapons to the current Muslim Brotherhood government of Egypt. Those in favor have stated that we made an agreement with the prior Egyptian government and therefore we must honor it.

After the French Revolution occurred the new French government attempted to get us into war with England based upon our alliance during the American Revolution. But we said no. A new and different French government in power made that agreement with a prior government invalid and we proclaimed our neutrality. We avoided a calamitous war with England and prospered from trade while France became a bloodbath ended only by Napoleon’s dictatorship.

It appears to be that ignorance of American history and precedence is a perquisite to being in power in today’s Washington.

Copyright 2013, Mark L. Bennett