On May 15, 2013 the Board of Supervisors discussed sending a
letter of opposition to the US Fish and Wildlife Service regarding their
proposal to remove about 1.8 million acres from constructive use as designated
habitat for the allegedly endangered or threatened yellow legged frog.
The Supervisors wisely decided to reopen this
discussion at a later date as a public hearing with the intended presence of
the Fish and Wildlife Service.
I made
the following comments to the Supervisors which incorporate some statements
I’ve made earlier:
“Thank you for letting me speak. About a year
ago I went to the Forest Service website to see what they were doing in our
area and read about ten projects in the El Dorado National Forest. One was
The Indian Valley Restoration Project which involved ‘three quarters of
a mile of a tributary stream of Indian Creek using a series of plug and ponds
to enhance habitat for yellow- legged
frogs, Yosemite toad, willow fly catcher’ and others. Note the word enhance. Many within the Forest Service and in the proposal’s public comments
stated that the project was unnecessary. Sometime later I went back to the Forest Service website and could not find those comments.
Perhaps the project comments were taken off their website or perhaps it’s a
lack in my computer skills. However, those proposal comments are public record
and I would assume available to the County.
I also learned that
plug means bringing in boulders from the Silver Lake
area. Since many within the Forest Service
want to ban vehicles by closing roads, I wondered what equipment was used. At a
recent Forest Service public meeting I asked
one of the forest rangers. I was told yes; they were using diesel trailer
trucks or similar equipment.
While the Forest Service site gave details about the projects,
their cost was conspicuously absent. So I emailed the Forest
Service. Their prompt and courteous reply said that the Indian Valley
Restoration Project “is estimated at about $200,000.” I would like to make the
simple statement that this environmental
extravagance is a waste of taxpayer dollars, but I cannot say that since this
money is borrowed from the Chinese and others, or just printed by the Federal
Reserve which will curse us, at some
future time, with inflation and hurt lower income people the most.
Also over the past
year I have been a member of the Amador County Transportation Commission’s Pine
Grove Stakeholders Group. During this time two critical yellow legged frog
habitats suddenly appeared in Pine Grove.
I don’t believe that the yellow legged frog and these other animals are
endangered or even threatened. I don’t confuse an excuse with a reason. I do
believe that these species are a subsidized, political constituency that are
part of the larger picture of kicking people and economic activity out of rural
areas. The discussions in this chamber regarding homeowners’ insurance, grey wolves,
mountain lions, town centers in the General Plan and countless other topics are
part of that same larger picture. I ask that you move forward with this letter
of opposition to the designation of about 1.8 million acres as critical
habitat.”
Along with Coke another corporation is sponsoring this
project as part of a partnership of about 11 organizations. Included is the
Foothill Conservancy which is monitoring the project. Not surprisingly, it doesn’t
say if they are getting paid. The project has now grown in scope to
approximately 35 plug and ponds. This
involves three days for road construction, about one week for materials
delivery and about three to four weeks for plug and pond construction. Yet this new construction is called a
restoration and is being sold to the public as such. The project promoters are obliviously lying.
Their only evidence is the Washoe Tribe claim that this is consistent with
prehistoric conditions.
At a recent Upcounty Community Council meeting I heard that
Gallagher’s Pub and adjoining facilities in Pioneer will soon be closing and
that the greenhouse operation at the former cedar mill site is having financial
trouble. Also discussed was Family Dollar Stores pressuring Payless Market in
Pioneer to close. This is all a stark contrast to the resources devoted to
plugs and ponds for the yellow legged frog. Some people’s priorities seem
distorted. Perhaps I need a social psychologist to understand them. But unless something changes we should all
learn to love the yellow legged frog since our developing economy may depend on
them.
Yellow legged frogs do, at least in coastal and nearby
areas, have a real problem. A fatal parasite came here attached to the imported
African clawed frogs. (Giant African land snails, which can transmit meningitis
to humans, have also entered parts of the USA. Isn’t globalization wonderful?
We send our jobs overseas and get back new diseases in return.) But if yellow legged frogs are in danger, the
approach of the environmental movement of propagating more of them has the
consequence of spreading more of this parasite.
It’s as if medieval people decided to fight the black plague by having more
children. Instead, those who survived
did so by cleaning the streets of rats and garbage and washing their bed linen
more often. Common sense says to fight the disease as was done at the UC Davis
campus. But this is not about the environment; it’s about social and economic
control. As I stated to the Board of Supervisors: “I don’t confuse an excuse
with a reason… these species are a subsidized political constituency that are
part of the larger picture of kicking people and economic activity out of rural
areas.”
Rather than being loved, the frogs are being used. Personally, I am rather fond of frogs and
have had some “pet” frogs on my property. And if I am ever able to complete my
landscaping projects, I will have a frog habitat in my garden.
___
Copyright 2013, Mark L. Bennett except for the section spoken
to the Board of Supervisors, which is now public record.