Tuesday, October 25, 2016

Environmental Faux Pas

Through both the environmental push to replace coal and free enterprise fracking slashing the price, natural gas has increasingly replaced coal as the preferred fuel to generate electricity.  But this transition has its quirks. Half of the final consumer cost of gas is transportation. Pipelines are increasingly controversial and costly. Coal comes via our often underutilized freight rail system. It can be stored like a pile of rocks. Natural gas requires new storage facilities, mostly underground. These usually encounter environmental objection. While I won’t even broach the technical arguments, we have all seen the dire consequences of inadequate maintenance of gas infrastructure. The bottom line is simple: we are becoming more dependent upon natural gas without building sufficient supply guarantees.

Given the right set of circumstances, we could briefly close our factories and lose the warmth of our homes. Many will simply blame the demonization of coal, the global warming hoax and environmental extremism. While many environmentalists are sincere people and some objections have validity, the movement is being had and funded by those seeking greater social control and increased dependency.  If you’re not sure who I’m referring to, they are all on Hillary Clinton’s email server.

Often criticized by the socialist left as misappropriation of resources or market failure, the law of supply and demand along with the action of entrepreneurs will always produce a surplus. That is the human spirit unleashed with freedom that made America the model for the world. Given a few organizational twists, Vladimir Lenin thought it the way to go and called it democratic mass production. We are a nation primarily of the descendants of European peasants and the formerly enslaved who enshrined a culture of abundance. But now we build to a precipice of possible restricted supply and diminished possibilities. We need look no further than our recently adopted General Plan to see the power opposing us deplorables that care to remember when America meant exuberance.

Daily and personally we experience this decline (which includes the dumbing down of education) as environmental extremism becomes the norm.  Officially, there has been a change. Institutional and government science has replaced corporate science, but the end product is just as questionable. “Near-infrared is important as it primes cells in your retina for repair and regeneration, which explains why LEDs—which is devoid of infrared—are so harmful for your eyes and health. One-third of the energy your body consumes comes from the food you eat. The vast majority of the energy your body needs to maintain the systemic equilibrium comes from environmental infrared light exposure. LEDs "sabotage health and promote blindness,” according to Mercola.com. I guess that if we are blind, then we won’t have to see a heated up world of forests and fields turned into deserts.

Donald Trump is not our savior. We are. But his presidency could spark a renewal and an awakening. History, and our adversaries, won’t give us a second chance.


Copyright 2016, Mark L. Bennett      

No comments:

Post a Comment